Skip to content

Peer-reviewed article

Transplantation of Abdominal Viscera

<h3>To the Editor. —</h3> In the March 10 issue of<i>JAMA</i>, Starzl et al<sup>1</sup>and Williams et al<sup>2</sup>describe a daring experimental procedure with potential efficacy for the treatment of a variety of otherwise fatal…

By John D. LantosJanuary 1, 19891 min readin JAMA

<h3>To the Editor. —</h3> In the March 10 issue of<i>JAMA</i>, Starzl et al<sup>1</sup>and Williams et al<sup>2</sup>describe a daring experimental procedure with potential efficacy for the treatment of a variety of otherwise fatal pediatric gastrointestinal problems. Starzl et al report the animal data that encouraged their group to experiment on humans. Williams et al report that, although the patients died, "the technical aspects of the procedure were tested and the feasibility of the procedure established." Goldsmith<sup>3</sup>describes the visceral transplantation procedures as "experimental operations" that have led to modifications in both the procedure and the patient populations for which it is considered. Moore,<sup>4</sup>in an accompanying editorial, describes three ethical considerations that should precede decisions to continue such research: only centers with adequate laboratory background, adequate clinical experience, and willingness to report results should proceed with such surgery. Neither article mentions institutional review board

Originally published at JAMA · January 1, 1989.

About the author

John D. Lantos is a pediatrician and bioethicist writing on AI in medicine, neonatal intensive care, and end-of-life decisions. His essays appear in JAMA, JAMA Pediatrics, the Hastings Center Report, the New England Journal of Medicine, and Aeon. Read more about John.

The full archiveSubscribe