Peer-reviewed article
Associations of Physician Perspectives, Personal Choices, and Counseling for Severe Congenital Heart Defects
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether physicians' perspectives of outcomes or personal choices are associated with prenatal counseling for termination of pregnancy (TOP) or perinatal hospice for severe congenital heart defects (CHDs). METHOD:…
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether physicians' perspectives of outcomes or personal choices are associated with prenatal counseling for termination of pregnancy (TOP) or perinatal hospice for severe congenital heart defects (CHDs). METHOD: Multicenter survey of pediatric cardiologists and congenital heart surgeons in the United States, 2016-2018. The survey measured perspectives of CHD outcomes, personal choices/considerations, and prenatal counseling for TOP or perinatal hospice. Bivariate comparisons estimated associations between outcome perspectives, personal choices, and counseling. RESULTS: Response rate was 77% (135/176); 47% (63/135) believed that single-ventricle portends good long-term quality of life or transplant-free survival. The majority (70%-90% depending on CHD type) would consider perinatal hospice for their own child, but a minority (2%-16% depending on CHD type) would choose perinatal hospice over TOP or postnatal intervention. Physicians who would consider TOP for themselves/their partner were more likely to counsel about TOP than physicians who would not consider TOP for themselves/their partner (99% vs. 67%, p < 0.001). There were no associations between institutional practice, outcome perspectives, personal consideration for hospice, and counseling practices. CONCLUSION: Physician perspectives of single-ventricle outcomes remain guarded but were not associated with counseling. However, personal choices/considerations are associated with counseling practices; therefore, considering personal beliefs is crucial to help families make fully informed decisions.
Related writing.
Why the Dutch Keep Pediatric Euthanasia Illegal
Pediatric euthanasia in The Netherlands has a unique legal status - it is illegal, openly practiced, and well-regulated. The most surprising part isn't the law that enabled this — it's what happened after.
Variation in the extent to which patient information leaflets describe potential benefits and harms of trial interventions: a commentary
Clinical trial participants must understand the possible risks and benefits of trial interventions before providing their informed consent to participate. The aim of this commentary is twofold: to summarize the discrepancies in the extent…
Pediatric Gender Medicine—Reply
Third, emerging evidence suggests that modulating glycosylation pathways could offer a novel therapeutic strategy for asthma management.Xie et al 5 proposed that targeting glycan recognition receptors, such as sialic acid-binding…
The Philosophical Fiction of Substituted Judgment
Peer-reviewed publication from the Lantos bibliography. Open the venue link for the full text.
About the author
John D. Lantos is a pediatrician and bioethicist writing on AI in medicine, neonatal intensive care, and end-of-life decisions. His essays appear in JAMA, JAMA Pediatrics, the Hastings Center Report, the New England Journal of Medicine, and Aeon. Read more about John.