Skip to content

Peer-reviewed article

The concept of risk in comparative effectiveness research.

The OHRP issued draft guidelines requiring disclosure of all risks of standard treatments in comparative-effectiveness research. The authors argue that such risks are not risks of participation in research and that the proposal will…

By John D. LantosJanuary 1, 20151 min readin The New England journal of medicine

The OHRP issued draft guidelines requiring disclosure of all risks of standard treatments in comparative-effectiveness research. The authors argue that such risks are not risks of participation in research and that the proposal will confuse and mislead patients.

Originally published at The New England journal of medicine · January 1, 2015.

About the author

John D. Lantos is a pediatrician and bioethicist writing on AI in medicine, neonatal intensive care, and end-of-life decisions. His essays appear in JAMA, JAMA Pediatrics, the Hastings Center Report, the New England Journal of Medicine, and Aeon. Read more about John.

The full archiveSubscribe