From the blog
Texas Abortion Decision
Sorry for the glitch on my last post. I'm working on it. My thoughts on the Texas Supreme Court decision can be read here:https://www.thehastingscenter.org/texas-supreme-court-offers-roadmap-for-legal-abortion/The decision is trying to in
Updated: Dec 19, 2023

Sorry for the glitch on my last post. I'm working on it. My thoughts on the Texas Supreme Court decision can be read here:
https://www.thehastingscenter.org/texas-supreme-court-offers-roadmap-for-legal-abortion/
The decision is trying to interpret the ambiguos statue that allows exemptions to the almost total ban on abortion. Those exemptions rely on doctors to make reasonable medical judgments about the likelihood that continuing a pregnancy will be harmful to the pregnant woman's health. They stress that only doctors But it seems to be trying hard to interpret a thoroughly ambiguous law. That is all that courts can do.
My slim ray of hope for women in Texas relies on the Court's explicit emphasis on the role of the doctor making a reasonable medical judgment. They write, "Under the law, it is a doctor who must decide that a woman is suffering from a life-threatening condition during a pregnancy, raising the necessity for an abortion to save her life or to prevent impairment of a major bodily function. The law leaves to physicians—not judges—both the discretion and the responsibility to exercise their reasonable medical judgment, given the unique facts and circumstances of each patient."
Related writing.
Why the Dutch Keep Pediatric Euthanasia Illegal
Pediatric euthanasia in The Netherlands has a unique legal status - it is illegal, openly practiced, and well-regulated. The most surprising part isn't the law that enabled this — it's what happened after.
Associations of Physician Perspectives, Personal Choices, and Counseling for Severe Congenital Heart Defects
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether physicians' perspectives of outcomes or personal choices are associated with prenatal counseling for termination of pregnancy (TOP) or perinatal hospice for severe congenital heart defects (CHDs). METHOD:…
Variation in the extent to which patient information leaflets describe potential benefits and harms of trial interventions: a commentary
Clinical trial participants must understand the possible risks and benefits of trial interventions before providing their informed consent to participate. The aim of this commentary is twofold: to summarize the discrepancies in the extent…
Pediatric Gender Medicine—Reply
Third, emerging evidence suggests that modulating glycosylation pathways could offer a novel therapeutic strategy for asthma management.Xie et al 5 proposed that targeting glycan recognition receptors, such as sialic acid-binding…
About the author
John D. Lantos is a pediatrician and bioethicist writing on AI in medicine, neonatal intensive care, and end-of-life decisions. His essays appear in JAMA, JAMA Pediatrics, the Hastings Center Report, the New England Journal of Medicine, and Aeon. Read more about John.