Skip to content

Peer-reviewed article

Risks (and Benefits) in Comparative Effectiveness Research Trials

To provide ethically appropriate oversight and informed consent for randomized, controlled comparative effectiveness research trials, investigators should consider, manage, and inform potential participants about at least nine different…

By John D. LantosJanuary 1, 20131 min readin New England Journal of Medicine

To provide ethically appropriate oversight and informed consent for randomized, controlled comparative effectiveness research trials, investigators should consider, manage, and inform potential participants about at least nine different types of potential risk.

Originally published at New England Journal of Medicine · January 1, 2013.

About the author

John D. Lantos is a pediatrician and bioethicist writing on AI in medicine, neonatal intensive care, and end-of-life decisions. His essays appear in JAMA, JAMA Pediatrics, the Hastings Center Report, the New England Journal of Medicine, and Aeon. Read more about John.

The full archiveSubscribe