Skip to content

Peer-reviewed article

Hot Debate About a Cool Therapy

The status of hypothermia as a treatment for perinatal asphyxia remains controversial. This review examines recent studies and professional opinions about whether this treatment should be considered “experimental” or “standard” and places…

By John D. LantosJanuary 1, 20091 min readin NeoReviews

The status of hypothermia as a treatment for perinatal asphyxia remains controversial. This review examines recent studies and professional opinions about whether this treatment should be considered “experimental” or “standard” and places the debate in the context of other debates about innovative neonatal therapies, including the use of oxygen, antenatal steroids, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and pressors. These controversies are examples of a fundamental epistemological question in the philosophy of science, namely, how much evidence is necessary to prove or disprove any hypothesis. Finally, we discuss the implications of the current level of knowledge about hypothermia for further research and clinical practice.

Originally published at NeoReviews · January 1, 2009.

About the author

John D. Lantos is a pediatrician and bioethicist writing on AI in medicine, neonatal intensive care, and end-of-life decisions. His essays appear in JAMA, JAMA Pediatrics, the Hastings Center Report, the New England Journal of Medicine, and Aeon. Read more about John.

The full archiveSubscribe