Peer-reviewed article
Advocating for the DREAM Act: Why Pediatricians Should Care and What They Can Do.
* Abbreviations: DACA — : Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals DREAM — : Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients are undocumented immigrants who were brought to the…
* Abbreviations: DACA — : Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals DREAM — : Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients are undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States before the age of 16, lived in the United States for at least 5 years, have no significant criminal history, and were <31 years of age on June 15, 2012. They are sometimes termed “Dreamers” after the never-passed legislation known as the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act. The DREAM Act would provide a path to citizenship for this population. DACA does not.
President Trump recently rescinded the executive memorandum that created the DACA program.1 Although his action does not take effect immediately, it leaves nearly a million Dreamers in limbo. Unless Congress acts by March 5, 2018, Dreamers’ legal status will expire. Starting on that date, more than 1000 DACA recipients will lose their legal status every day. If that happens, they will lose their ability to work lawfully and to take out educational loans. They will face potential deportation by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. This will have both a personal impact and a societal one. One DACA recipient (and a coauthor of this article) described the personal impact:
> In the past few months, I have felt the return of that crippling fear. I feel it in my …
Address correspondence to John D. Lantos, MD, Children’s Mercy Hospital Bioethics Center, Kansas City, 2401 Gillham Rd, Kansas City, MO 64108. E-mail: jlantos{at}cmh.edu
Related writing.
Why the Dutch Keep Pediatric Euthanasia Illegal
Pediatric euthanasia in The Netherlands has a unique legal status - it is illegal, openly practiced, and well-regulated. The most surprising part isn't the law that enabled this — it's what happened after.
Associations of Physician Perspectives, Personal Choices, and Counseling for Severe Congenital Heart Defects
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether physicians' perspectives of outcomes or personal choices are associated with prenatal counseling for termination of pregnancy (TOP) or perinatal hospice for severe congenital heart defects (CHDs). METHOD:…
Variation in the extent to which patient information leaflets describe potential benefits and harms of trial interventions: a commentary
Clinical trial participants must understand the possible risks and benefits of trial interventions before providing their informed consent to participate. The aim of this commentary is twofold: to summarize the discrepancies in the extent…
Pediatric Gender Medicine—Reply
Third, emerging evidence suggests that modulating glycosylation pathways could offer a novel therapeutic strategy for asthma management.Xie et al 5 proposed that targeting glycan recognition receptors, such as sialic acid-binding…
About the author
John D. Lantos is a pediatrician and bioethicist writing on AI in medicine, neonatal intensive care, and end-of-life decisions. His essays appear in JAMA, JAMA Pediatrics, the Hastings Center Report, the New England Journal of Medicine, and Aeon. Read more about John.