Peer-reviewed article
Medically induced preterm birth and the associations between prenatal care and infant mortality
PURPOSE: During the last 30 years, the use of prenatal care, both the proportion of women receiving the recommended number of visits and the average number of visits, has increased substantially. Although infant mortality has decreased,…
PURPOSE: During the last 30 years, the use of prenatal care, both the proportion of women receiving the recommended number of visits and the average number of visits, has increased substantially. Although infant mortality has decreased, the incidence of preterm birth has increased. We hypothesized that prenatal care may lead to lower infant mortality in part by increasing the detection of obstetrical problems for which the clinical response may be to medically induce preterm birth.
METHODS: We examined whether medically induced preterm birth mediates the association between prenatal care and infant mortality by using newly developed methods for mediation analysis. Data are the cohort version of the national linked birth certificate and infant death data for 2003 births. Analyses were adjusted for maternal sociodemographic, geographic, and health characteristics.
RESULTS: Receiving more prenatal care visits than recommended was associated with medically induced preterm birth (odds ratio [OR], 2.44; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.40-2.49) compared with fewer visits than recommended). Medically induced preterm birth was itself associated with greater infant mortality (OR, 5.08; 95% CI, 4.61-5.60) but that association was weaker among women receiving extra prenatal care visits (OR 3.08; 95% CI, 2.88-3.30) compared with women receiving the recommended number of visits or fewer.
CONCLUSIONS: These analyses suggest that some of the benefit of prenatal care in terms of infant mortality may be in part due to medically induced preterm birth. If so, the use of preterm birth rates as a metric for tracking birth policy and outcomes could be misleading.
Related writing.
Why the Dutch Keep Pediatric Euthanasia Illegal
Pediatric euthanasia in The Netherlands has a unique legal status - it is illegal, openly practiced, and well-regulated. The most surprising part isn't the law that enabled this — it's what happened after.
The Tiniest Patients: Rethinking How We Decide
	When a baby is born at 22 or 23 weeks of pregnancy — half the normal gestational period — doctors and parents face one of the most agonizing decisions in all of medicine. Should they fight to keep the baby alive, knowing survival is u
When facts are not fixed: rethinking shared decision making at the margins of neonatal viability.
Parents and doctors face difficult decisions when a baby is born at the borderline of viability. Somehow, they must voice their values, shared concerns, and disagreements in a way that allows an initial decision about life-sustaining…
Survival After Court-Ordered Treatment Withdrawal
NR (as he is named in UK court documents) was born in 2020 with a malformed brain. He had, callosal agenesis, cortical dysgyria, dysplastic basal ganglia, a cleft lip and palate, and anopththalmia (no eyeballs). He was not expected to survi
About the author
John D. Lantos is a pediatrician and bioethicist writing on AI in medicine, neonatal intensive care, and end-of-life decisions. His essays appear in JAMA, JAMA Pediatrics, the Hastings Center Report, the New England Journal of Medicine, and Aeon. Read more about John.