Peer-reviewed article
A Premature Infant With Necrotizing Enterocolitis Whose Parents Are Jehovah's Witnesses
With this article, we introduce a new feature in Pediatrics called “Ethics Rounds.” The goal of this new feature is to present clinical cases that raise ethical issues. We present each case to pediatricians and bioethicists, who comment on…
With this article, we introduce a new feature in Pediatrics called “Ethics Rounds.” The goal of this new feature is to present clinical cases that raise ethical issues. We present each case to pediatricians and bioethicists, who comment on the case on the basis of the information that they have at the time. We then give these same commentators the conclusion of the case and ask for further reflections. The case is printed in italic font, and comments are in normal, Roman font.
To protect patient privacy, we change certain facts of each case. Thus, although the reports are based on real cases, the names, ages, location, and gender of the patient may be changed if they are not relevant to the central issues of the case.
We invite readers to submit cases to the editor of Ethics Rounds: John Lantos, MD (jlantos@cmh.edu).
Our first case involves an extremely premature infant who developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We presented the case, as it evolved, to 2 experienced pediatrician-bioethicists, Dr William Meadow and Dr Chris Feudtner. We then asked another pediatrician-bioethicist, Armand H. Matheny Antommaria, who has training in religious ethics to comment on the case and the discussion.
Infant Smith was born at 25 weeks' gestation by emergency cesarean delivery after placental abruption. His birth weight was 475 g. He was stable for the first 4 days. A head ultrasound on day 2 showed a grade II intraventricular hemorrhage on the right. He had oxygen saturation levels of 94% on low ventilator settings. On day 5, Infant Smith experienced a decrease in oxygen saturation and abdominal distension. An abdominal radiograph showed free air in the abdomen. A surgical consult was obtained, and an exploratory laparotomy was scheduled. As part of the consent for surgery, the parents were asked to consent …
Address correspondence to John Lantos, MD, Children's Mercy Bioethics Center, Children's Mercy Hospital, 2401 Gillham Rd, Kansas City, MO 64108. E-mail: jlantos{at}cmh.edu
Related writing.
Why the Dutch Keep Pediatric Euthanasia Illegal
Pediatric euthanasia in The Netherlands has a unique legal status - it is illegal, openly practiced, and well-regulated. The most surprising part isn't the law that enabled this — it's what happened after.
The Tiniest Patients: Rethinking How We Decide
	When a baby is born at 22 or 23 weeks of pregnancy — half the normal gestational period — doctors and parents face one of the most agonizing decisions in all of medicine. Should they fight to keep the baby alive, knowing survival is u
When facts are not fixed: rethinking shared decision making at the margins of neonatal viability.
Parents and doctors face difficult decisions when a baby is born at the borderline of viability. Somehow, they must voice their values, shared concerns, and disagreements in a way that allows an initial decision about life-sustaining…
Survival After Court-Ordered Treatment Withdrawal
NR (as he is named in UK court documents) was born in 2020 with a malformed brain. He had, callosal agenesis, cortical dysgyria, dysplastic basal ganglia, a cleft lip and palate, and anopththalmia (no eyeballs). He was not expected to survi
About the author
John D. Lantos is a pediatrician and bioethicist writing on AI in medicine, neonatal intensive care, and end-of-life decisions. His essays appear in JAMA, JAMA Pediatrics, the Hastings Center Report, the New England Journal of Medicine, and Aeon. Read more about John.